DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 11 of 11

1
Investigating the Folk Concept of Pain: Implication & Projection ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Deniability: Investigating the Folk Concept of Pain ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2022
BASE
Show details
3
The polarity effect of evaluative language
BASE
Show details
4
Oddness/Naturalness of concept + but + thin concept ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
5
Thick Ethical Concepts and Social Norms - Effect of Valence ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
6
Are Thick Concepts Action-Guiding? Exp 2 ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
7
Are Thick Concepts Action-Guiding? Exp 1 ...
Willemsen, Pascale. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
8
Examining evaluativity in legal discourse : A comparative corpus-linguistic study of thick concepts ...
Willemsen, Pascale; Baumgartner, Lucien; Frohofer, Severin. - : University of Zurich, 2021
BASE
Show details
9
Empirically investigating the concept of lying ...
BASE
Show details
10
Causal Attributions and Corpus Analysis
Abstract: Although philosophers have often held that causation is a purely descriptive notion, a growing body of experimental work on ordinary causal attributions using questionnaire methods indicates that it is heavily influenced by normative information. These results have been the subject of sceptical challenges. Additionally, those who find the results compelling have disagreed about how best to explain them. In this chapter, we help resolve these debates by using a new set of tools to investigate ordinary causal attributions—the methods of corpus linguistics. We apply both more qualitative corpus analysis techniques and the more purely quantitative methods of distributional semantics to four target questions: (a) Can corpus analysis provide independent support for the thesis that ordinary causal attributions are sensitive to normative information? (b) Does the evidence coming from corpus analysis support the contention that outcome valence matters for ordinary causal attributions? (c) Are ordinary causal attributions similar to responsibility attributions? (d) Are causal attributions of philosophers different from causal attributions we find in corpora of more ordinary language? We argue that the results of our analyses support a positive answer to each of these questions.
Keyword: Causation; Cognitive Science
URL: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/14848/1/___Causal%20Attributions%20and%20Corpus%20Analysis__PREPRINT.pdf
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/14848/
BASE
Hide details
11
I must although I can't!? Suggestions for a two-level theory of ‘ought implies can’ ...
Willemsen, Pascale; Wiegmann, Alex. - : PsyArXiv, 2017
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
11
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern